Difference between revisions of "Help:FAQ"
(→Why not use the non-X term, e.g. nonmotile or catalase negative) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
== Why is there no term for abolished X? == | == Why is there no term for abolished X? == | ||
Revision as of 14:14, 30 June 2011
Contents
Why is there no term for abolished X?
PATO has a quality named "abolished". We consider abolished to be the limit case of decreased. Use decreased X.
Why would you describe a complete loss as decreased X, which a child of X positive?
Example:
- decreased motility is a child of motile
- decreased catalase activity is a child of catalase activity
Why not use the non-X term, e.g. nonmotile or catalase negative
We use terms like nonmotile and catalase negative to annotate properties of a species, while decreased motility or decreased catalase activity are used for mutants where there is less of X than in the reference strain (wt or a parent), which is motile and catalase positive.
References
See Help:References for how to manage references in omp dev.
