Help:FAQ

From omp dev
Revision as of 14:14, 30 June 2011 by Azweifel (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Why is there no term for abolished X?

PATO has a quality named "abolished". We consider abolished to be the limit case of decreased. Use decreased X.

Why would you describe a complete loss as decreased X, which a child of X positive?

Example:

  • decreased motility is a child of motile
  • decreased catalase activity is a child of catalase activity

Why not use the non-X term, e.g. nonmotile or catalase negative

We use terms like nonmotile and catalase negative to annotate properties of a species, while decreased motility or decreased catalase activity are used for mutants where there is less of X than in the reference strain (wt or a parent), which is motile and catalase positive.

References

See Help:References for how to manage references in omp dev.